Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

BC3 44% slower than BC2 on folder compares

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • BC3 44% slower than BC2 on folder compares

    BC3 seems to be much slower (44%) than BC2 doing binary comparisons of my data. Is everyone seeing a similar slowdown? Is it expected or a bug?

    Here's my setup so you an judge relative speeds.

    BC 2.5.1 (build 251)
    BC 3.0.1 (build 8602)
    Windows 2000 Pro. SP5
    Intel P4 1.7 GHz
    1.256 GB

    All source is on a separate server over a 100Mbit Ethernet connection.
    The server has enough memory that this data is probably always cached
    and the server is pretty much dedicated to serving only me when I run
    the tests. So, variance in network and server delays is not significant.

    Binary comparison, all settings as similar as I can make them.
    Comparing two identical directory trees on the same server.
    177 MB total data.
    2800 C, C++ source files.
    2000 directories in the tree - most are empty - about 200 contain files.


    Tests repeated several times on the same box,
    in quick succession but varying order.
    Sometimes 3.0.1 goes first, sometimes 2.5.1

    Nothing else running. Before the tests task manager performance
    reports 0% to 2% utilization and the System Idle Process is getting
    99% cpu. No other process shows anything but 0% cpu utilization.

    Results are consistent within one or two seconds across all runs.

    BC 2.5.1 takes 45 seconds to do a full refresh.
    BC 3.0.1 takes 65 seconds to do a full refresh.

    (65-44)/44 is approximately 0.44, so BC3 is 44% slower than BC2.

    By the way, a timestamp only comparison takes 5 seconds for BC2
    and 7 seconds for BC3. (7-5)/5 is 0.4 so even that is 40% slower!

  • #2
    This seems the same problem I have with BC 3. Why is there no answer yet on this? Is the scooter team working on this???

    Comment


    • #3
      Reinder,

      Thanks for reporting the slow down, and sorry for the slow response to your question. We've been a little bit swamped by the response to the release of BC 3. I'll look into this and let you know what I find out.
      Chris K Scooter Software

      Comment


      • #4
        From experience, BC3 is definitely significantly slower than BC2

        Thanks for running the numbers to prove it, JustMe.

        Comment


        • #5
          The slow speed of binary comparisons should be fixed in the new release (3.0.5). Let me know if you still have any trouble with it.
          Zoë P Scooter Software

          Comment


          • #6
            That fixed it.

            I tested BC 3.0.5 on the same setup as my original test and there is no significant difference between it and BC 2.5.1.

            Thanks.

            Comment

            Working...
            X