I know that it has already been stated that an option to synchronize start two MP3 files will not be added due to technical challenges. Would the following suggestion provide a work-around to those challenges?
The amount of delay between the starts could be smaller (I just used .1 seconds as an example).
If a user can click Play on one side, pause it, then click Play on the other side and resume Play on the first side to manually syncronized the playing of two files, then I fail to see why something similar cannot be done programmatically???
Whether or not an option to sync-start two files is implemented, I would like to see an option to combine both tracks of a stereo MP3 file into a mono track that plays only on one channel so that:
Although one would lose the stereo, one could more easily listen for subtle differences between two similar files.
Start Left Side
Start Right Side .1 seconds later (but start it .1 seconds into the file)
Start Right Side .1 seconds later (but start it .1 seconds into the file)
The amount of delay between the starts could be smaller (I just used .1 seconds as an example).
If a user can click Play on one side, pause it, then click Play on the other side and resume Play on the first side to manually syncronized the playing of two files, then I fail to see why something similar cannot be done programmatically???
Whether or not an option to sync-start two files is implemented, I would like to see an option to combine both tracks of a stereo MP3 file into a mono track that plays only on one channel so that:
Left file plays in left channel only (left speaker)
Right file plays in right channel only (right speaker)
Right file plays in right channel only (right speaker)
Although one would lose the stereo, one could more easily listen for subtle differences between two similar files.
Comment